Comments on: “Goode” Opportunity for PR is Lost on Winery http://www.tardyslip.net/index.php/2009/07/01/goode-opportunity-lost-on-winery/ Mon, 31 May 2010 17:54:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: zegarki http://www.tardyslip.net/index.php/2009/07/01/goode-opportunity-lost-on-winery/comment-page-1/#comment-111 zegarki Sun, 02 May 2010 16:00:29 +0000 http://www.tardyslip.net/?p=233#comment-111 Yes, that is true, I agree with you, but I am not sure if there are no other options. Yes, that is true, I agree with you, but I am not sure if there are no other options.

]]> By: Rock http://www.tardyslip.net/index.php/2009/07/01/goode-opportunity-lost-on-winery/comment-page-1/#comment-21 Rock Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:27:51 +0000 http://www.tardyslip.net/?p=233#comment-21 Suzanne...you freely throw around the words "loser" and "fool" to describe people who do not like companies that lie to them with marketing schemes. I do not get why you think we do not have a right to be angry. You obviously are a shill for MG, its sad that your company's marketing plan includes two parts 1. lies 2. mean spirited attacks on those who question them. Suzanne…you freely throw around the words “loser” and “fool” to describe people who do not like companies that lie to them with marketing schemes. I do not get why you think we do not have a right to be angry. You obviously are a shill for MG, its sad that your company’s marketing plan includes two parts 1. lies 2. mean spirited attacks on those who question them.

]]> By: Suzanne Llywellyn http://www.tardyslip.net/index.php/2009/07/01/goode-opportunity-lost-on-winery/comment-page-1/#comment-16 Suzanne Llywellyn Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:39:39 +0000 http://www.tardyslip.net/?p=233#comment-16 Jenn, my friends and I viewed hundreds of those Murphy-Goode videos online, and we even voted for our "favorites." However, absolutely none of us thought for a second that votes would determine the winners. We read the ground rules just like everyone else. The only people who are complaining are Sargent fans... so what does that tell you? That Sargent fans don't read like the rest of us? I mean, gee whiz... don't you guys get it? From what I understand there were three other top 10 vote getters that didn't get into the final 50 (including the 2nd place vote-getter), but the other seven of them did... this shows that Murphy-Goode paid attention to the voting, but that they still needed to make their selection based upon their own criteria, and Sargent didn't fit, plain and simple! Jenn, my friends and I viewed hundreds of those Murphy-Goode videos online, and we even voted for our “favorites.” However, absolutely none of us thought for a second that votes would determine the winners. We read the ground rules just like everyone else. The only people who are complaining are Sargent fans… so what does that tell you? That Sargent fans don’t read like the rest of us?

I mean, gee whiz… don’t you guys get it? From what I understand there were three other top 10 vote getters that didn’t get into the final 50 (including the 2nd place vote-getter), but the other seven of them did… this shows that Murphy-Goode paid attention to the voting, but that they still needed to make their selection based upon their own criteria, and Sargent didn’t fit, plain and simple!

]]>